ABSTRACT
Adsorption and desorption studies on different types
of adsorbents, including natural materials such as teak tree bark powder, rice
husk, natural bentonite, different algae like Ecklonia maxima, Escherichia
coli, Ascophyllum nodasum, Rhizopus nigricans, Cladophora
fascicularis, goethite and soils of three nuclear power plant and
artificial materials such as Fe oxide-coated sand, goethite pretreated with
phosphate, dithizone-modified sodium trititanate whisker, modified nano-metre
sized TiO2, Chromosorb 102 resins and poly(m-phenylenediamine) are
summarized. The kinet-ics, thermodynamics, sorption/desorption mechanism of
different metal ions on different adsorbents under different experimental
conditions are discussed. It is found that desorbing agent is greatly dependent
on the adsorbate used. All the metal ions are desorbed using acids like HCl,
HNO3 and H2SO4 in most of the cases, except
Cr(VI). EDTA can be used to remove Pb2+ and Zn 2+ in
addition to acids. Since Cr(VI) is present in anionic form; it can be
eliminated from the loaded adsorbents using bases like NaOH, Na2CO 3
or NaHCO3.
CHAPTER
ONE
1.1
BACKGROUND
OF THE STUDY
THE heavy metals present in the
aquatic environment are considered to be the major inorganic contaminant due to
their mobility in the aqueous ecosystem, toxicity to higher life forms and
non-biodegradable nature. The heavy metals hazardous to human health include
Pb, Hg, Cd, As, Cu, Zn and Cr. As and Cd cause cancer, Hg can cause mutations
and genetic damage, while Cu, Pb and Hg can cause brain and bone damage. The
problem of heavy metal pollution in water and aquatic organisms, including fish
needs continuous monitoring and surveil-lance as these elements do not degrade
and tend to bio-magnify in man through food chain. Hence, there is a need to
remove heavy metals from the aquatic ecosystem. Several methods have been
devised for the treatment and removal of heavy metals. The commonly adopted proce-dure
for removing the heavy metal ions from aqueous streams includes chemical
precipitation, lime coagula-tion, ion exchange, reverse osmosis and solvent
extrac-tion1. These so-called conventional methods are not so
effective when the metal concentration in the effluent is low. These methods
are also non-selective. Adsorption
*e-mail:
spm_iter@rediffmail.com
process may be an alternative
technology for the removal of heavy metals, which are present in very low
concentra-tion in the aquatic environment. In the adsorption proc-ess, both
biosorbents and chemical sorbents can be used for metal removal and recovery.
Biosorbents include Earth’s forests and plants, ocean and freshwater plankton,
algae, fish and all living creatures. Similarly, in chemi-sorption process,
several adsorbents like zeolite, activated carbon, fly ash, clay and red mud
can be used.
The process of biosorption can only
be economical if a suitable eluant is used for the recovery of metals from the
loaded adsorbent. In a complete metal removal and re-covery process, the
adsorbents are to be used in a con-tinuous sorption–desorption cycle. For this
purpose, the adsorbents should fulfill the following criteria2: (i)
They should be cheap and reusable. (ii) Both uptake and release of metal ions
should be efficient and rapid. (iii) Desorption of metal ions from the sorbents
should be metal-selective and economically feasible.
Although U uptake capacity of Penicillium
and Actin-omycetes is the same, Penicillium sp. is considered as a
better biosorbent as metals can be eluted from it more ef-ficiently3.
Therefore, selection of specific eluants is more important. Sodium carbonate4,
potassium cyanide5, EDTA6, nitric acid7,
sulphuric acid and hydrochloric acid8 are some of the common eluants
used for the recov-ery of metal ions from the loaded adsorbents. The main
objective of the present article is to review adsorption– desorption
characteristics of different heavy metals from their respective adsorbents.
1.2
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Heavy metal pollution occurs in many
industrial waste-waters such as those produced by metal plating facilities,
mining operations, battery manufacturing processes, the production of paints
and pigments, ammunition, ceramic and glass industries. This wastewater
commonly includes Cd, Pb, Cu, Ni, and Cr. These heavy metals are not
biode-gradable and their presence in streams and lakes leads to bioaccumulation
in living organisms, causing health prob-lems in animals, plants, and human
beings. Excessive human intake of Cd leads to damage of kidney and renal
system, skeletal deformation (Itai-itai), cardiovascular dis-eases and
hypertension (Oliver,
1997). Severe
gastrointesti-nal irritation, muscular pain, anemia, teeth discoloration, loss
of smell and possible necrotic changes in the liver and kidney can also occur.
Cadmium is also known carcin-ogen. Therefore, the removal of excess heavy metal
ions from wastewater is essential to protect human and environ-mental health.
As a result, the removal of toxic heavy metal ions from sewage and from
industrial and mining effluents has been widely studied in recent years.
The most widely used methods for
removing heavy met-als are chemical or electrochemical precipitation (Lai and Lin, 2003; Ozdemir et al., 2005) and ion exchange
treat-ment (Cardoso
et al., 2004). It has been reported that some aquatic plants (Axtell et al., 2003), agricultural
by-products (Argun
et al., 2005, 2007; Chuah et al., 2005), clay (Ma´r-quez et al., 2004), zeolite (Erdem et al., 2004), turba (Ho et al., 1995) and microorganisms (Li et al., 2004) have the capacity to adsorb
and accumulate heavy metals.
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
is a strong oxidant (standard potential 1.80 and 0.87 V at pH 0 and 14,
respectively) (Neyens
and Baeyens, 2003)
and its application in the treat-ment of various organic and inorganic
pollutants is well established. However, oxidation by H2O2
alone is not effec-tive for high concentrations of complex organic and
inor-ganic compounds, because of low rates of reaction at reasonable H2O2
concentrations. Transition metal salts
(e.g., iron salts), ozone and
UV-light can activate H2O2 to form hydroxyl radicals.
Among these materials ferrous iron and hydrogen peroxide commonly known as
Fenton’s reagent. Hydrogen peroxide and ferrous ions are usually more stable in
a strong acid. However, if hydrogen perox-ide is added to an aqueous system
containing an organic substrate and excess ferrous ions in a strong acid, a
com-plex redox reaction (Ahn et al., 1999) will occur as in
Fe2þ þ H2O2 ! Fe3þ
þ OH þ HO
|
ð1Þ
|
RHþHO !H2OþR
|
ð2Þ
|
R
|
þ H2O2 ! ROH þ OH
|
ð3Þ
|
R
|
þO2 !ROO
|
ð4Þ
|
Hydroxyl radicals (oxidation
potential: 2.8 V) are stronger oxidants than ozone and H2O2.
The Fenton reaction causes the dissociation of the oxidant and the formation of
highly reactive hydroxyl radicals that attack and destroy the or-ganic
components (Neyens
and Baeyens, 2003).
The Fen-ton reaction has also several important advantages such as a short
reaction time among all advanced oxidation pro-cesses, iron and H2O2
are cheap and non-toxic, there is no mass transfer limitations due to its
homogenous catalytic nature, there is no energy involved as catalyst and the
pro-cess is easily to run and control. It has been widely used for treatment of
highly polluted industrial wastewaters (San Sebastian et al., 2003; Lopez et al., 2004) and remediation of polluted soils (Li et al., 1997).
Tree barks are produced in large
quantities at sawmills as a solid waste. It basically contains lignin,
cellulose and tannin. Some components of barks, such as phenolic groups of
lignin, polysaccharides and tannins, have stained the treated water and greatly
increased COD. Several mod-ification techniques have been studied to reduce
organic components of natural adsorbent and to increase adsorp-tion capacity (Horsfall et al., 2006;
Argun and Dursun,
2006; Taty-Costodes et
al., 2003). However, effect of Fen-ton on modification of the natural
adsorbents did not exist. For this purpose in this study, we extensively
studied the modification of a natural adsorbent (pine bark) with Fen-ton’s
reagent (hydrogen peroxide and ferrous ions) for cad-mium removal which was
intended to benefit of the Fenton destroy of organic components in barks.
1.2
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
The main
significance is to carry out a research on the adsorption of heavy metal
(arsenic ,copper, lead cadmium) using activated complexes (bamboo chips, palm
kernel chips and snail shell) clay and its composite treated and untreated.